Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 2
  • <<
  • 1

  • 2016

  • Huber, Andreas; Weiss, Astrid; Rauhala, Marjo (2016) : The ethical risk of attachment how to identify, investigate and predict potential ethical risks in the development of social companion robots: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI): Christchurch, New Zealand: IEEE Press, S. 367-374

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451774 

    Abstract: In this paper we present the Triple-A Model intended as a framework for researchers and developers to incorporate ethics in the user-and robot-centered design of social companion robots. The purpose of the model is to help identifying potential ethical risks in the implementation of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) scenarios. We base our model on three interaction levels, which companion robots can offer: Assistance, Adaptation, and Attachment (Triple-A). Every single interaction level has its specific potential ethical risks, which can be addressed during the robot development phase. However, we especially focus on the prominent ethical risks of long-term human-robot attachment and its implications on human-robot relationships. We discuss the practical use and the theoretical foundation of the Triple-A model which is well-grounded in the social role theory from sociology and the human cognitive-mnestic structure from cognitive science.

    Keywords: assistance adaptation, Attachment, bonding, Cognition, Cognitive Science, ethical aspects, ethical risk, Ethics, HRI, human cognitive-mnestic structure, human-robot attachment, human-robot interaction, human-robot interaction scenarios, human-robot relationships, ieee xplore, Moral & Ethik, robot companions, robot development phase, robot-centered design, social companion robots, Social role, social role theory, socially assistive robots, triple-A model, user centred design, user-centered design

  • 2015

  • van Bommel, Tara; Sheehy, Amy; Ruscher, Janet B. (2015): The role of attachment style in women’s recognition of sexism. In: Personality and Individual Differences 74, S. 235-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.029

    Abstract: The present research examined how differences in attachment style might impact women’s awareness of sexism. Identity threat models of stigma emphasize the role of individual differences in responding to social identity threats, however little is known about what factors lead to avoidance versus vigilance for such threats. Furthermore, research shows that insecure attachment is related to avoidant responses to blatantly threatening cues, but vigilance when such cues are ambiguous. Thus, insecurely attached women should acknowledge less sexism toward women when faced with instances of blatant sexism, whereas their awareness should be heightened by instances of ambiguous sexism. Conversely, securely attached women should acknowledge sexism when encountering blatant rather than ambiguous instances of sexism. In a test of these hypotheses, 155 women were exposed to either a male verbally rejecting a women’s opinion for blatantly sexist or ambiguously sexist reasons. The data confirm predictions. The findings suggest interventions to improve outcomes for stigmatized groups should consider impacts of attachment style, and further, that attachment style might partially explain women’s divergent responses to sexism.

    Keywords: Attachment, Geschlechterforschung, PREJUDICE, science direct, Sexism, Stereotyped Attitudes, stigma
  • <<
  • 1