Alle Publikationen
- <<
- <
- 1
2018
-
(2018): Influence of emotional valence on perceived psychological distance depends on emotional intensity. In: European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (5), S. 687-700. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2361
Abstract: Previous findings regarding the relationship between emotional valence and psychological distance were mixed. The current research examined whether emotional intensity moderates the influence of emotional valence on psychological distance. We manipulated intensity and valence by asking participants to describe a positive or negative event from either a high intensity or low intensity perspective. Studies 1 and 2 revealed that negative events were perceived to be more distant than positive events in the low‐intensity condition in two distinct cultural groups. Study 3 further proved that the obtained patterns were generalizable to different emotions. Finally, Study 4 found that a reduced alert level, but not perceived threats, mediated the interactive effects of valence and intensity on psychological distance. This research highlights the importance of considering the joint effect of different dimensions of emotion, thus advancing the understanding of complex processes of emotion. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
2017
-
(2017): Social distance influences the outcome evaluation of cooperation and conflict. Evidence from event-related potentials. In: Neuroscience letters 647, S. 78-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.018
DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315726 Abstract: Previous research shows that social distance plays an important role in promoting cooperation and that subtle cues that reduce social distance increase the tendency to cooperate. However, it is unclear how social distance influences our outcome evaluation of cooperative and conflict feedback. The present study investigated the influence of social distance on cooperative and conflict behavior and the evaluation process of the cooperative and conflict outcomes, using the event-related potentials (ERPs) technique. We recorded ERPs from 14 normal adults playing a social game task against a friend and a stranger. The results showed that the FRN (Feedback Related Negativity) and P300 were affected by the opponent's choice to cooperate or aggress; however, only the P300 was affected by social distance. Specifically, when the opponent chose to cooperate, the feedback elicited a smaller FRN and a larger P300 amplitude; and compared with playing against friends, the P300 had a larger amplitude when participants gaming with strangers. Our results indicate that at the early stage of the evaluation of cooperation and conflict outcomes, individuals may initially and quickly encode the valence of outcomes, judging whether an outcome is consistent with their expectations. However, at the late stage, which involves a top-down cognitive appraisal process, some social factors, such as social distance, may moderate processing of attention resource allocation of feedback about outcomes, and of higher-level motivation/affective appraisal. zitiert von 1
-
(2017): When is it appropriate to reprimand a norm violation? The roles of anger, behavioral consequences, violation severity, and social distance.. In: Judgment and Decision Making 12 (4), S. 396-407
Abstract: Experiments on economic games typically fail to find positive reputational effects of using peer punishment of selfish behavior in social dilemmas. Theorists had expected positive reputational effects because of the potentially beneficial consequences that punishment may have on norm violators’ behavior. Going beyond the game-theoretic paradigm, we used vignettes to study how various social factors influence approval ratings of a peer who reprimands a violator of a group-beneficial norm. We found that ratings declined when punishers showed anger, and this effect was mediated by perceived aggressiveness. Thus the same emotions that motivate peer punishers may make them come across as aggressive, to the detriment of their reputation. However, the negative effect of showing anger disappeared when the norm violation was sufficiently severe. Ratings of punishers were also influenced by social distance, such that it is less appropriate for a stranger than a friend to reprimand a violator. In sum, peer punisher ratings were very high for a friend reprimanding a severe norm violation, but particularly poor for a stranger showing anger at a mild norm violation. We found no effect on ratings of whether the reprimand had the beneficial consequence of changing the violator’s behavior. Our findings provide insight into how peer punishers can avoid negative reputational effects. They also point to the importance of going beyond economic games when studying peer punishment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) zitiert von 1
-
(2017): Preferred Interpersonal Distances. A Global Comparison. In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48 (4), S. 577-592. DOI: 10.1177/0022022117698039
Abstract: Compared preferred interpersonal distances across the world in an extensive analysis over a large data set of 8,943 participants aged 17-88 years from 42 countries. The present study aimed to relate the preferred social, personal, and intimate distances observed in each country to a set of individual characteristics of the participants (age, gender), and some environmental and sociopsychological attributes of their cultures - parasite stress, population growth rate, ingroup favoritism, average annual temperature, and human development index (HDI). Participants rated interpersonal distance on graphic scales by indicating how near a stranger, acquaintance, or close person could approach them so they would feel comfortable in a conversation with them. Results show that individual characteristics (age and gender) influenced interpersonal space preferences and that some variation in results could be explained by temperature in a given region. Women preferred a greater distance with strangers and acquaintances, older people preferred greater distance with acquaintances and close persons. The higher the temperature, the closer the preferred distance to strangers; however, this relationship was reversed for close persons: Here, the preferred personal distance became greater for higher temperatures. Objective values of preferred interpersonal distances in different regions are presented, which might be used as a reference data point in future studies. zitiert von 8
-
(2017): Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral. In: The Journal of Social Psychology 157 (4), S. 502-512. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1242471
DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685243 Abstract: Individuals are consistently observed to be risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This study examined whether increased social distance would change these behavioral patterns. To test our hypothesis, social distance was manipulated by asking the participants to make decisions either for themselves or for another person (Experiment 1), either for a known person or for an unknown person (Experiment 2), and either for a close friend or for a distant friend (Experiment 3). The results of Experiments 1 and 3 showed that increased social distance made people more risk-neutral, and such an effect was stronger in the gain domain than in the loss domain. However, the effect of social distance was not observed in Experiment 2. These findings suggest that risk preferences are influenced by the social distance between decision makers and beneficiaries. zitiert von 4
Keywords: Adult, Decision Making, distance, Female, Humans, Male, Risk-Taking, Social Distance, Sozialpsychologie, Verhaltensforschung, Young Adult -
(2017): Interactive effects of appeal type and social distance on helping intention. In: Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 45 (5), S. 785-794. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.6070
Abstract: We examined the interplay of appeal type and social distance in prosocial behavior in 3 studies. Results of Study 1, which was a single-factor design, showed that participants (n = 85) were more likely to evaluate the impact of their help on recipients when they were socially distant than when they were socially close. Results of Study 2 (n = 250) and Study 3 (n = 162), each of which was a 2 (appeal type: significance appeal vs. control appeal) × 2 (social distance: high vs. low) between-subjects design, showed that when the helper and recipient were socially distant, appeals that emphasized the significance of the help to the recipient increased helping intention, because there was a greater likelihood that the favor would be returned. However, such effect was mitigated when the social distance was small. Results suggest that the principles that are applied in interaction with others vary according to social distance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) zitiert von 6
2016
-
(2016): Social learning across psychological distance. In: Journal of personality and social psychology 110 (1), S. 1-19. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000042
DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26727663 Abstract: While those we learn from are often close to us, more and more our learning environments are shifting to include more distant and dissimilar others. The question we examine in 5 studies is how whom we learn from influences what we learn and how what we learn influences from whom we choose to learn it. In Study 1, we show that social learning, in and of itself, promotes higher level (more abstract) learning than does learning based on one's own direct experience. In Studies 2 and 3, we show that when people learn from and emulate others, they tend to do so at a higher level when learning from a distant model than from a near model. Studies 4 and 5 show that thinking about learning at a higher (compared to a lower) level leads individuals to expand the range of others that they will consider learning from. Study 6 shows that when given an actual choice, people prefer to learn low-level information from near sources and high-level information from distant sources. These results demonstrate a basic link between level of learning and psychological distance in social learning processes. zitiert von 18
2013
-
(2013): Am I acceptable to you?. Effect of a robot’s verbal language forms on people’s social distance from robots. In: Computers in Human Behavior 29 (3), S. 1091-1101. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.001
Abstract: Abstract This study is to examine the effect of robots’ language forms on people’s acceptance of robots. We applied a concept of social distance to measure people’s acceptance of robots. In an experiment, calling participants by name vs. not calling by name as well as the robot’s speech styles (familiar vs. honorific), were used to impose a verticality and horizontality of social relationships between participants and robots. After the conversation with a robot, participants rated the robot’s interpersonal traits and their comfortable approach distance to the robot, and their response to the robot during the experiment were analyzed. As a result, participants whom the robot called by their name perceived the robot as friendlier. They introduced themselves more actively, and were more intently focused on what the robot said. They asked the robot questions more frequently. Participants called by their names consequently approached the robot more closely than participants who were not called. An interaction effect was found between speech styles and whether names were used in regard to the perceived friendliness of robots, negative response to robots, and comfortable approach distance to robots. We discuss verbal interaction design for increasing people’s acceptance of robots. Highlights • A social distance based on human’s cognitive information processing was proposed. • The effect of language form on people’s social distance from robots was evaluated. • There were socially acceptable combinations of calling name and speech styles. zitiert von 21
2011
-
(2011): Understanding the Link Between Spatial Distance and Social Distance. In: Social Psychology 42 (3), S. 185-192. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000062
Abstract: Why do people use spatial language to describe social relationships? In particular, to what extent do they anchor their thoughts about friendship in terms of space? Three experiments used drawing and estimation tasks to further explore the conceptual structure of social distance using friendship as a manipulation. In all three experiments, participants read short narratives and then drew what they imagined happened during the narrative and estimated passing time. Overall, the results of these exploratory studies suggest that the conceptual structure of friendship is linked to thought about space in terms of path drawing. Results are discussed in light of social distance and intercharacter interaction. zitiert von 33
-
(2011): Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game. An ERP study. In: Biological psychology 88 (2-3), S. 253-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009
DOI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21889968 Abstract: Previous research showed that social distance (e.g., being friends or strangers) influences people's fairness consideration and other-regarding behavior. However, it is not entirely clear how social distance influences the recipient's evaluation of (un)fair behavior. In this study, we let people play a dictator game in which they received (un)fair offers from either friends or strangers while their brain potentials were recorded. Results showed that the medial frontal negativity (MFN), a component associated with the processing of expectancy violation, was more negative-going in response to unfair than to fair offers from friends whereas it did not show differential responses to offers from strangers. The P300 was more positive for fair than for unfair offers irrespective of friends or strangers making the offers. These results suggest that violation of social norms can be detected at an early stage of evaluative processing and that this detection can be modulated by social distance. zitiert von 66
Keywords: Adult, Analysis of Variance, Biologie, distance, Event-Related Potentials, P300/physiology, Female, Friends/psychology, Frontal Lobe/physiology, Games, Experimental, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Reward, science direct, Social Distance, Social Values, Verhaltensforschung, Young Adult 1993
-
(1993): Raumlicher Abstand in dyadischen Interaktionen. In: Gruppendynamik 24 (1), S. 5-21
Abstract: Tests assumptions of the personal space concept in two studies. The first study, with 30 subjects aged 19-44, revealed that the physical distance between two people is more a transient, rapidly shifting phenomenon that depends heavily on the type and quality of interaction, contrary to assumptions of the personal space model. A model of interpersonal space is thus considered more appropriate. In the second study, with 66 subjects, the distance between two persons was measured repeatedly during either a cooperation or a competition condition. Smaller distances were chosen in the cooperation condition, and distances decreased even further over time. The results are interpreted as confirmation that distance in dyadic interactions is a complex phenomenon in which the type of interaction and the passage of time are both relevant. Zur Prufung von Annahmen des Personal-Space-Konzeptes wurden zwei Untersuchungen durchgefuhrt. Die erste Studie, an der 30 Personen zwischen 19 und 44 Jahren teilnahmen, zeigte im Gegensatz zu den Annahmen des Personal-Space-Modells, dass raumliche Distanz bei Menschen eher ein fluchtiges, schnell veranderbares Phanomen ist, das stark von der Art und Qualitat der Interaktion zwischen zwei Menschen gepragt ist. Daher wird die Modellvorstellung eines "interpersonal space" als angemessener betrachtet. In der zweiten Untersuchung mit 66 Probanden wurde die Distanz zwischen zwei Personen mehrmals wahrend einer Kooperations- oder Wettbewerbsbedingung gemessen. Es zeigte sich, dass in der Kooperationsbedingung die Abstande kleiner gewahlt wurden und dass sie sich im Verlauf der Zeit noch weiter verringerten. Die Ergebnisse werden als Bestatigung dafur gewertet, dass der raumliche Abstand in dyadischen Interaktionen ein komplexes Phanomen ist, bei dem neben der Art der Interaktion auch der Zeitverlauf relevant ist.
- <<
- <
- 1