Alle Publikationen
- <<
- <
- 1
2017
-
(2017): The aesthetics of minorities against the correlation of strong institutionalism, scientism and technicality. on the voice-praxis of the minorities as art-literature. In: CLAREIRA-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA DA REGIAO AMAZONICA (4/1), S. 13-48
Abstract: In the paper, we defend that the aesthetic voice-praxis allows to social movements, citizen initiatives and political-cultural minorities the self-expression and self-affirmation from themselves and by themselves in terms of lyrical-political I-We, so that to frame and overcome the correlation of strong institutionalism, scientism and technicality which characterizes the constitution, legitimation, evolution and social-political linking of modern institutions, such as science, law, political parties and economy. These modern institutions or social systems are logical-technical, non-political and non-normative structures-subjects, marked and streamlined for a self-referential and self-subsisting dynamics which is eminently endogenous, autonomous and overlap in relation to the spontaneity and informality of the epistemological-political subjects, values and practices proper to civil society, centralizing and monopolizing the constitution, programming and functioning of their fields of research and objects and, from here, framing the own voice-praxis of these civil society's epistemological-political subjects in their nowadays action and relatively to institutions. In this sense, in the correlation of strong institutionalism, scientism and technicality, the institutions become the basis, the arena, the value and the epistemological-political subject par excellence and exclusive of the foundation of themselves and even relating to the social-cultural structuration and evolution, peripherizing the informal and spontaneous epistemological-political subjects of civil society. Against this apolitical and depoliticizing tendency assumed by modern social systems, we argue in favor of an aesthetics of the minorities that enables both their spontaneous and informal, political, politicizing and normative self-affirmation and self-expression, with no scientist and institutionalist mediations, and a political-normative praxis which is alternative and opposed to strong institutionalism and its scientism and technicism, because it is inclusive, participative and direct. Therefore, the social criticism, political-normative praxis and cultural resistance need a non-systemic, non-institutionalist, non-technicist and non-scientificist voice-praxis that can be founded and allowed by aesthetics in its anti-paradigmatic, non- institutionalist and anti-scientificist sense.
Keywords: Ästhetik, Bruch, Diskriminierung, Fehlverhalten, Gesellschaft, institutionalism, Interaktion, Kunstgeschichte, Minderheiten, minorities, Normativität, Normen, Poesie in der Politik, scientism, social systems, Soziale Klasse / Schicht, Soziale Systeme, soziokulturelle Strukturen, Subjekte, subversive, technicism, Technizität -
(2017): Sociality and Normativity for Robots. Philosophical Inquiries into Human-Robot Interactions. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality). Online verfügbar unter https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gbv/detail.action?docID=4867905
Abstract: This volume offers eleven philosophical investigations into our futurerelations with social robots--robots that are specially designed to engage andconnect with human beings.The contributors present cutting edge research thatexamines whether, and on which terms, robots can become members ofhuman societies. Can our relations to robots be said to be 'social'?Can robots enter into normative relationships with human beings? Howwill human social relations change when we interact with robots atwork and at home?The authors of this volume explore these questions from theperspective of philosophy, cognitive science, psychology, androbotics. The first three chapters offer a taxonomy for the classificationof simulated social interactions, investigate whether human socialinteractions with robots can be genuine, and discuss the significanceof social relations for the formation of human individuality.Subsequent chapters clarify whether robots could be said to actuallyfollow social norms, whether they could live up to the socialmeaning of care in caregiving professions, and how we will need toprogram robots so that they can negotiate the conventions of humansocial space and collaborate with humans. Can we perform jointactions with robots, where both sides need to honour commitments, andhow will such new commitments and practices change our regionalcultures?The authors connect research in social robotics andempirical studies in Human-Robot Interaction to recent debates insocial ontology, social cognition, as well as ethics and philosophy oftechnology.The book is a response to the challenge that social robotics presentsfor our traditional conceptions of social interaction, whichpresuppose such essential capacities as consciousness, intentionality,agency, and normative understanding. The authors develop insightfulanswers along new interdisciplinarypathways in 'robophilosophy,' a new research area that will help us toshape the 'robot revolution,' the distinctive technological change ofthe beginning 21st century. Raul Hakli (PhD) studied philosophy and computer science at theUniversity of Helsinki, Finland. He received his PhD in theoreticalphilosophy in 2010. While editing the book he was Associate Professorat the Aarhus University, Denmark. Currently he works as a researcherat the University of Helsinki, Finland. His research interests includesocial ontology, collective intentionality, epistemology, philosophyof social robotics, and philosophy of the social sciences. Johanna Seibt (PhD. at the Univ of Pittsburg, USA; Dr. phil. habil. atthe Univ of Konstanz, Germany) is Professor for Applied ProcessOntology and Integrative Social Robotics, Aarhus University, Denmark;previously she taught at the Univ of Texas at Austin, USA. Her mainresearch area is in analytical ontology and metaphysics. More recentlyshe works also in philosophy of social robotics. She is head of theResearch Unit for Robophilosophy at the School for Culture and Society, Aarhus University, which conducts interdisciplinaryHumanities research of and in social robotics and coordinates theinternational Research Network for Transdisciplinary Studies in SocialRobotics (TRANSOR).
2015
-
(2015): Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Erste Auflage. Berlin: Suhrkamp (Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft)
-
(2015): Die Möglichkeit der Normen. Über eine Praxis jenseits von Moralität und Kausalität. 1. Aufl.. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Online verfügbar unter http://www.content-select.com/index.php?id=bib_view&ean=9783518738870
Abstract: Wenn wir von Normen sprechen, denken wir zumeist an Vorschriften, die unser Leben regeln - die uns sagen, was wir tun sollen oder was wir nicht tun dürfen. Normen, so könnte man meinen, verlangen stets bestimmte Handlungen oder Unterlassungen und erfordern eine moralische Rechtfertigung. Aber stimmt das überhaupt? Lässt sich damit das Gemeinsame all jener sozialen Praktiken, die wir als normativ bezeichnen möchten, erfassen? Christoph Möllers bestreitet das und behauptet, dass unser Umgang mit Normen an falschen Erwartungen leidet. Wir überfordern, so seine These, die Praxis des Normativen mit moralischen Ansprüchen und mit Hoffnungen auf Wirksamkeit. Beides verfehlt sie, denn die meisten Normen, denen wir begegnen, sind weder moralisch überzeugend gerechtfertigt, noch haben sie eindeutige Wirkungen. Dies ist kein Zufall, ja, es ist noch nicht einmal ein Problem, denn Normen erfüllen einen anderen Zweck: Indem sie eine bestimmte Möglichkeit des Weltverlaufs kennzeichnen und mit einer Bewertung versehen, erlauben sie es uns, inmitten einer Praxis zu ebendieser Praxis auf Abstand zu gehen und Alternativen zu ihr gegenwärtig zu halten. Dies funktioniert aber nur, wenn Normen eine distanzierende Spannung zur Welt aufbauen und auf Dauer stellen können. Ihre eigene Übertretung zuzulassen, so ein Ergebnis dieses Buches, ist deshalb nicht die geringste Aufgabe von Normen. Christoph Möllers, geboren 1969, lehrt Öffentliches Recht und Rechtsphilosophie an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
2014
-
(2014): Habermas’ sociological theory of law and democracy. In: Philosophy & Social Criticism 40 (2), S. 225-234. DOI: 10.1177/0191453713518327
Abstract: In Between Facts and Norms (1996) Habermas presents the more straightforward normative discourse theory of law and democracy, in terms of contemporary legal orders, and then examines, in terms of social theory, whether the theory is plausible, given the complex nature of today's conditions. The following article focuses in particular on Habermas' social theory. It is critical of Habermas' idea of 'the lifeworld' and discusses whether the circulation-of-power model might be mapped onto the system-lifeworld model.
2009
-
(2009): From autonomy to heteronomy (and back). The enaction of social life. In: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4), S. 527-550. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-009-9139-1
Abstract: The term "social cognition" can be construed in different ways. On the one hand, it can refer to the cognitive faculties involved in social activities, defined simply as situations where two or more individuals interact. On this view, social systems would consist of interactions between autonomous individuals; these interactions form higher-level autonomous domains not reducible to individual actions. A contrasting, alternative view is based on a much stronger theoretical definition of a truly social domain, which is always defined by a set of structural norms; moreover, these social structures are not only a set of constraints, but actually constitute the possibility of enacting worlds that would just not exist without them. This view emphasises the heteronomy of individuals who abide by norms that are impersonal, culturally inherited and to a large extent independent of the individuals. Human beings are socialised through and through; consequently, all human cognition is social cognition. The article argues for this second position. Finally, it appears that fully blown autonomy actually requires heteronomy. It is the acceptance of the constraints of social structures that enables individuals to enter new realms of common meaningfulness. The emergence of social life marks a crucial step in the evolution of cognition; so that at some evolutionary point human cognition cannot but be social cognition.
Keywords: autonomy, cognition,, Disziplin, Interaction, Kognitionswissenschaft/Social Sciences/Humanities, Kognitive Skills/Social Cognition, Kultur, kultureller Zusammenhang, Kulturspezifizität, Kulturtheorie, Normativität, Normen, Philosophie, Social Cognition, social learning, social systems, Sozialisierung, Sozialverhalten, Voraussetzungen für sozial angemessenes Verhalten
- <<
- <
- 1