Alle Publikationen

  • Erweiterte Suche öffnen

Treffer: 3
  • <<
  • 1
  • 2014

  • Christen, Markus; van Schaik, Carel; Fischer, Johannes; Huppenbauer, Markus; Tanner, Carmen (2014): Empirically informed ethics. Morality between facts and norms. Cham: Springer (Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy)

    Abstract: This volume provides an overview of the most recent developments in empirical investigations of morality and assesses their impact and importance for ethical thinking. It involves contributions of scholars both from philosophy, theology and empirical sciences with firm standings in their own disciplines, but an inclination to step across borders?in particular the one between the world of facts and the world of norms. Human morality is complex, and probably even messy?and this clean distinction becomes blurred whenever one looks more closely at the various components that enable and influence our moral actions and ethical orientations. In that way, morality may indeed be located between facts and norms?and an empirically informed ethics that is less concerned with analytical purity but immerses into this moral complexity may be an important step to make the contributions of ethics to this world more valuable and relevant. zitiert von: 8

  • 2010

  • Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir (2010): Ethnomethodology and the moral accountability of interaction. Navigating the conceptual terrain of ‘face’ and face-work. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8), S. 2147-2157. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.019 

    Abstract: Ethnomethodology investigates the mundane, practical work of society's members’ sense-making practices and how they reproduce social–moral orders. It also reminds us that ‘face’ and face-work are overarching social science concepts which assist social scientists in doing their descriptive work. This paper outlines aspects of ethnomethodology's contribution to the study of ‘face’ and the doing of face-work in terms of an interactional accomplishment. While this occupied Goffman, he did not use detailed data of the kind this paper uses—that is, audio/video recordings and subsequent detailed transcriptions of members’ everyday naturally occurring interaction. The paper will reproduce one strip of interaction drawn from a wider ethnographic study of senior organizational members doing their strategy work across time and space. The analytical interest is focused on just two aspects: one is Garfinkel's notion of the moral accountability of action, and the second draws o n Sacks’ seminal work on membership categorization devices. The latter brings to our attention the predicates or ‘rights and obligations’ pertaining to categories. Moreover, when a breach is discerned on this front, then emotional displays are skillfully warranted as the excerpt indicates. Examining members interactional accomplishment of such phenomena as proposed here will be shown to add further empirical and theoretical texture/insight to Goffman's concept of face and face-work, or, as is proposed here, the moral accountability of interaction constituting social–moral order(s) or ‘society’. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) zitiert von 30

  • 2006

  • Chappell, Timothy D. J. (2006): Values and virtues. Aristotelianism in contemporary ethics. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press (Mind Association occasional series). Online verfügbar unter http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=216043

  • <<
  • 1