Alle Publikationen
- <<
- <
- 1
2017
-
(2017): The Influence of Parental and Communication Style on Consumer Socialization. In: Journal of Advertising Research 57 (3), S. 319-334. DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2017-002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2017-002 Abstract: This meta-analysis merged family communication pattern (FCP) and parental socialization literature streams to offer renewed perspectives on how parents intervene in media-related consumer-socialization interactions with children. With only one exception, FCP-type effects were not different from theorized corresponding parental socialization-style effect sizes. This supports prior literature suggesting equivalency between specific FCP and parental socialization pairs. Furthermore, when certain FCP–parental socialization pairs were compared with other pairs on socialization interactions, such as control, coviewing, and discussing media strategy, differences were found that prior theorizing would have supported. Implications of these results are discussed, including what they suggest for managers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) zitiert von 2
2015
-
(2015): In-your-face politics. The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Online verfügbar unter http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1512/2014956135-d.html
Abstract: "Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media."--Dust jacket flap "'In-your-face' politics refers to both the level of incivility and the up-close and personal way that we experience political conflict on television. ... Mutz finds that incivility is particularly detrimental to facilitating respect for oppositional political viewpoints and to citizens' levels of trust in politicians and the political process. On the positive side, incivility and close-up camera perspectives contribute to making politics more physiologically arousing and entertaining to viewers. This encourages more attention to political programs, stimulates recall of the content, and encourages people to relay content to others."--From publisher description Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media Includes bibliographical reference and index
Keywords: Ekel, Fehlverhalten, Fernsehen, Fernsehsendung, Kommunikation, Kommunikationswissenschaft, Mass media, Medien, Meinungsbildung, Mensch-Technik-Relationen (MTR), Öffentlichkeit, Political aspects, Politik, Politikwissenschaft, Politische Kommunikation, Politische Meinungsbildung, Politische Methode, Realtechnik, Skandalisierung und Arousal, Soziale Angemessenheit, Technik, Television in politics, USA 2011
-
(2011): Die Zukunft der Cultural Studies. Theorie, Kultur und Gesellschaft im 21. Jahrhundert. Bielefeld: Transcript (Cultural studies)
Abstract: Die Zukunft der "Cultural Studies" wird erörtert. Dabei wird die Auffassung verdeutlicht, dass sich die Cultural Studies in der ersten Dekade des dritten Jahrtausends als eine umstrittene, aber gleichzeitig vielschichtige und die Komplexität des kulturellen und gesellschaftlichen Lebens erhellende Formation zeigen. Die Vielfalt der theoretischen Paradigmen, intellektuellen Perspektiven und empirischen Zugänge verbindet ihre Verpflichtung zur kritischen Analyse der Gegenwart. Ausgehend von der zentralen Relevanz von Kultur in der sich herausbildenden globalen Gesellschaft werden in den Cultural Studies die Machtverhältnisse in unterschiedlichen Kontexten analysiert, Kontingenz und Relationalität gesellschaftlicher Praktiken werden aufgezeigt. Verhältnisse von Theorie, Kultur und Gesellschaft im 21. Jahrhundert werden kritisch analysiert. - Inhalt: (1) Rainer Winter: Einleitung: Cultural Studies - Jetzt und in der Zukunft. (2) Michael Ryan: Prolegomena zu den Kulturwissenschaften. (3) Ryan Bishop: Die Cultural Studies der Zukunft: Ein Plädoyer für mehr Mut und mehr Anregungen von außen. (4) Hanno Hardt: Wozu Cultural Studies? (5) Rainer Winter: Kritik, soziale Gerechtigkeit und Intervention: Qualitative Forschung in der amerikanischen Tradition. (6) Scott Lash: Posthegemoniale Macht: Cultural Studies im Wandel? (7) Douglas Kellner: Medienspektakel und Medienevents: Kritische Überlegungen. (8) Nick Couldry: Können wir eine Medienethik erstellen, und wenn ja, auf welcher Grundlage? (9) Huimin Jin: Für einen globalen Dialogismus: Zur begrifflichen Überwindung des "kulturellen Imperialismus" und der damit verbundenen kritischen Positionen. (10) Mike Featherstone: Die Moderne und die kulturelle Frage. zitiert von 14
2008
-
(2008) : Socialization In: Haith, Marshall M.: Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development: Amsterdam: Elsevier Acad. Press, S. 224-235
Abstract: Socialization is the process by which infants and children acquire the standards, skills, motives, attitudes, and behaviors that are appropriate for a particular society and culture. Currently, ecological systems theory is the central framework for understanding socialization. According to this perspective, many agents play a role in the socialization process including families, peers, media, neighborhoods, schools, and religious institutions. Within families, various subsystems are recognized, including the parent–child dyad, the co-parenting, marital, and sibling subsystems as well as the family unit itself. Families, in turn, are embedded in a variety of extrafamilial socialization systems (e.g., peers and schools) and they operate together with families rather than independently. A variety of factors such as child characteristics including genetic differences, personal parental resources, contextual factors, and ethnicity modify the operation of these socialization influences.
- <<
- <
- 1