Alle Publikationen
- <<
- <
- 1
2016
-
(2016): Supplemental Material for Power and the Pursuit of a Partner’s Goals. In: Journal of personality and social psychology. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000048.supp
Abstract: We investigated how power dynamics in close relationships influence the tendency to devote resources to the pursuit of goals valued by relationship partners, hypothesizing that low (vs. high) power in relationships would lead individuals to center their individual goal pursuit around the goals of their partners. We study 2 related phenomena: partner goal prioritization, whereby individuals pursue goals on behalf of their partners, and partner goal contagion, whereby individuals identify and adopt as their own the goals that their partner pursues. We tested our ideas in 5 studies that employed diverse research methods, including lab experiments and dyadic studies of romantic partners, and multiple types of dependent measures, including experience sampling reports, self-reported goal commitment, and behavioral goal pursuit in a variety of goal domains. Despite this methodological diversity, the studies provided clear and consistent evidence that individuals with low power in their relationships are especially likely to engage in both partner goal prioritization and partner goal contagion. zitiert von 16
-
(2016) : Das Bedürfnis nach Kontrolle als soziale Motivation In: Bierhoff, Hans-Werner; Frey, Dieter (Hg.): Soziale Motive und soziale Einstellungen: 1. Auflage: Göttingen: Hogrefe (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Themenbereich C, Theorie und Forschung. Serie VI, Sozialpsychologie), S. 53-86
Abstract: Ein Überblick über die Forschung zu den Bedingungen und Auswirkungen von Kontrolle und deren motivationalen Grundlagen wird gegeben. Zunächst wird geklärt, was (Sozial-)Psychologinnen und (Sozial-)Psychologen von Kontrolle sprechen. Dann wird die Frage diskutiert, ob es sich beim Streben nach Kontrolle um ein menschliches Grundmotiv handelt. Die Auswirkungen wahrgenommener Kontrolle auf menschliches Denken, Fühlen und Handeln werden besprochen, und es wird erörtert, wie Menschen mit wahrgenommenem Kontrollmangel umgehen (etwa soziale Verteidigungsreaktionen wie gruppenbasierte oder kompensatorische Kontrolle). Abschließend wird - über den Rahmen klassischer Theorien und Befunde hinausgehend - gezeigt, dass Kontrollprozesse in ganz unterschiedlichen Bereichen der Sozialpsychologie von Bedeutung sind. Insbesondere geht es hierbei um die Transaktionen zwischen Individuen und ihrer physikalischen sowie ihrer sozialen Umwelt, wobei letztere an sich durch Kontrollbeziehungen (soziale Macht) gekennzeichnet ist und gleichzeitig die Grundlage für soziale Koordination und Kooperation und somit Prozesse kollektiver Kontrolle ("collective action") bildet.
2011
-
(2011) : Emotion, self-regulation, and social behavior in cultural contexts In: Chen, Xinyin; Rubin, Kenneth H. (Hg.): Socioemotional development in cultural context: New York, NY: Guilford (Social, emotional, and personality development in context), S. 131-163
Abstract: Presented a cultural model of emotion, self-regulation, and social development. The authors argue that culture plays a pivotal role in the socialization of emotion, having an effect on children's ability to self-regulate and ultimately their social behavior. Topics of discussion include the functional relations between emotional and social development, the aspects of social competence, parenting, universal and individual developmental conditions, the role of culture-specific socialization conditions, the role of cognitive and emotional factors in the development of self-regulation, universal and culture-specific conditions of emotion regulation, and culture-specific aspects of socialization processes. It is concluded a culturally informed view on the development of emotion and social behavior is necessary for the proper evaluation of any actual outcome. The need for more cross-cultural, within-culture, and culturally informed studies on the development of emotion regulation, self-regulation, and social competence is recommended. zitiert von 42
2007
-
(2007): Social communication. New York [u.a.]: Psychology Press (Frontiers of social psychology)
Abstract: Presents an overview of the topic of social communication within the field of social psychology. Contributions focus on the tools and repertoires evolved by social communication to deal the demanding trade-off inherent in communication: For communication to be successful, it must be informative and subtle at the same time. Contents: (1) K. Fiedler: Frontiers of research on social communication: Introduction and overview. (A) Communication within and between groups and cultures. (2) Y. Kashima, O. Klein, and A. E. Clark: Grounding: Sharing information in social interaction. (3) D. Wigboldus and K. Douglas: Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. (4) L. G. Conway, III and M. Shaller: How communication shapes culture. (5) H. Giles et al: Accommodating a new frontier: The context of law enforcement. (6) D. Stahlberg et al: Representation of the sexes in language. (B) Strategic uses of social communication. (7) H.-P. Erb and G. Bohner: Social influence and persuasion: Recent theoretical developments and integrative attempts. (8) M. Wänke: What is said and what is meant: Conversational implicatures in natural conversations, research settings, media, and advertising. (9) A. B. Hollingshead, G. C. Jacobsohn, and S. J. Beck: Motives and goals in context: A strategic analysis of information sharing in groups. (C) Social communication, affect, and behavior regulation. (10) J. Bavelas and J. Gerwing: Conversational hand gestures and facial displays in face-to-face dialogue. (11) A. Vrij: Deception: A social lubricant and a selfish act. (12) C. Chung and J. Pennebaker: The psychological functions of function words. (D) Social communication and adaptive behavior regulation. (13) M. Snyder and A. Stukas, Jr.: Interpersonal processes in context: Understanding the influence of settings and situations on social interaction. (14) G. R. Semin: Linguistic markers of social distance and proximity. (15) M. Corballis: The evolution of language. (16) M. Schober: Epilogue: Language at the heart of social psychology.
2005
-
(2005): Culture, essentialism, and agency. Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups?. In: European Journal of Social Psychology 35 (2), S. 147-169. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.237
Abstract: Compared how human individuals and social groups are perceived as social entities across different cultures. College students from East Asia (n=357, mean age 20 years), three English-speaking countries (n=300, mean age 20 years), and continental Europe (n=225, mean age 21 years) completed a questionnaire assessing two aspects of perceived "entitativity" (psychological essentialism and agency) as well as causal beliefs determining this perception. Perceptions concerning individuals, families, friendship groups, and society were reported. Individuals were considered more essence-like and unchangeable than social groups across all cultures. Similarly, more agency was ascribed to individuals, but only in Western cultures: East Asians conferred an equal level of agency to individuals and groups. Moreover, individuals were generally assigned more psychological essentialism than friendship groups and societies. The results are discussed with reference to concepts of individualism and collectivism. zitiert von 137
- <<
- <
- 1